This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. Please elaborate the response with your personal views and any relevant classwork if necessary

: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. Please elaborate the response with your personal views and any relevant classwork if necessary.

(Answer) The writer of the review tries to point out how a “trip to the moon” has the same fascinating effect on the audience that 2015 Hill Valley from “Back to the future” had on the 1980’s audience. Even today, a child would be fascinated with the idea of owning a hover-board and clothes that dried out automatically.

Considering that it was the early 1900’s, filmmakers basically wanted to achieve a spectacle more than anything else. Today the audience wants a film to be more relatable than for it to be a spectacle. If this film was watched today, the audience would relate to the protagonist being an underdog as opposed to the fascination of traveling to the moon that was the chief attraction of the film in those days. The writer’s critique points out these aspects well