Choose a peer-reviewed business law article that is no more than 6 months old that is not included in your annotated bibliography. Address the following: How prestigious is the journal that you are using? What is the journal’s impact? How widely published are the authors of this article? Why did you choose this article? How did the prestige of the journal and of the authors influence your choice? What is the article about? What are the limitations of this article? Why should others read this article? How does reading a peer-reviewed article enhance your understanding of business law in ways different from reading a textbook? Be sure to make connections between the assigned materials and your ideas. You don’t need to write a huge essay, but it should be at least 350-400 words long. Your replies to others should comment on new insights you gained in reading their essays, and how their ideas did or did not change your own viewpoint. Try to respond to two learners with perspectives different from your own in order to demonstrate your understanding of other frameworks and perspectives
References Ostas, D. T. (2011). The ethics of corporate legal strategy: A response to Professor Mayer. American Business Law Journal, 48(4), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01124.x Peregrine Academics. (2020). Academic Leveling Courses. http://www.peregrineacademics.com/home/academic-leveling-courses University of Cambridge. (2012, August 3). Why study law at University if I don’t want to become a lawyer. https://www.law.cam.ac.uk/access-outreach/why-study-law